CaReL Guidelines: A Consensus-Based Guideline on Case Reports and Literature Review (CaReL) Sakshi Prasad, Mahmoud Nassar, Ahmed Y. Azzam, Francisco García-Muro-San José, Mahnaz Jamee, Rim Kasem Ali Sliman, Giuseppe Evola, Ayman M. Mustafa and 49 more Introduction Clinical case reports enrich medical literature by presenting rare medical issues. However, case reports that do not adhere to a standard template often lack rigor and limit their usefulness in clinical guidance. Several guidelines for reporting case reports have been structured, while further… 2024 11,743 reads 34 citations doi:10.58742/bmj.v2i2.89 Full text PDF XML Read abstract — read the abstract for CaReL Guidelines: A Consensus-Based Guideline on Case Reports and Literature Review (CaReL) Original Articles CaReL Guidelines: A Consensus-Based Guideline on Case Reports and Literature Review (CaReL) Sakshi Prasad, Mahmoud Nassar, Ahmed Y. Azzam, Francisco García-Muro-San José, Mahnaz Jamee, Rim Kasem Ali Sliman, Giuseppe Evola, Ayman M. Mustafa and 49 more IntroductionClinical case reports enrich medical literature by presenting rare medical issues. However, case reports that do not adhere to a standard template often lack rigor and limit their usefulness in clinical guidance. Several guidelines for reporting case reports have been structured, while further improvements are still required. The current guideline (CaReL) aims to enhance the comprehensiveness of case reports by integrating a detailed literature review. MethodsIn total, 56 researchers were selected based on specific publication criteria for structuring the guidelines. The guideline development was based on a two-step consensus process, including a literature review and survey distribution. Responses underwent scrutiny to ensure reliability and validity. Content validity was assessed, with revisions made to achieve a content validity index exceeding 0.78. The guideline's feasibility and effectiveness were evaluated by pilot testing, with feedback incorporated for finalization, ensuring the robustness and practicality of the guideline. ResultsThe CaReL guidelines can improve the quality of case reports through a comprehensive checklist with an increased emphasis on literature review. In addition to traditional sections with their subsections discussed in previous guidelines, the checklist also focuses on literature review in the abstract and discussion. ConclusionThe CaReL guidelines offer a comprehensive structure for documenting case reports. They highlight the importance of incorporating a literature review to better introduce medical issues to readers and scholars and embedding reported cases into the current scientific state of the art. Implementing these guidelines can promote knowledge sharing and improve patient care Keywords Case report · Literature review · CaReL guideline · Case study · Scholarly community All subjects Barw Medical Journal. 2024;2(3) Read the article PDF XML
