ISSN: 2960-1959
Publisher
Original Articles

Epithelial-Myoepithelial Carcinoma of Salivary Glands: A Tertiary Center Experience

Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Smart Health Tower, Madam Mitterrand Street, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq
Department of Abdominal Wall Surgery, Smart Health Tower, Madam Mitterrand Street, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq
Department of Pathology, Sulaymaniyah Teaching Hospital, Zanko Street, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq
Department of Abdominal Wall Surgery, Smart Health Tower, Madam Mitterrand Street, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq
Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, Madam Mitterrand Street, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq
Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Smart Health Tower, Madam Mitterrand Street, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq
Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, Madam Mitterrand Street, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq
Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Smart Health Tower, Madam Mitterrand Street, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq
Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Smart Health Tower, Madam Mitterrand Street, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq
Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Smart Health Tower, Madam Mitterrand Street, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq
Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Smart Health Tower, Madam Mitterrand Street, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq
Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Smart Health Tower, Madam Mitterrand Street, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq
Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Smart Health Tower, Madam Mitterrand Street, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq
Department of Scientific Affairs, Smart Health Tower, Madam Mitterrand Street, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq

Abstract

Introduction

Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma (EMC) is a rare, biphasic malignant tumor affecting the salivary glands. It represents less than 1% of all salivary gland tumors. This study aims to present a single-center experience regarding the diagnosis, management, and prognosis of EMC.

Methods

This study was conducted between February 2020 and December 2025. Patients with a histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma were identified. Complete medical records containing demographics, clinical presentation, imaging results, histological features, treatment approaches, and follow-up results were included in the cases.

Results

Five patients were identified, of which 4 (80%) were females. The mean age was 56 ± 9.38 years. Two patients (40%) presented with painless post-auricular swelling, 1 (20%) with submandibular swelling, and 2 (40%) were incidental findings. Histopathological examination confirmed EMC in all cases. Free margins were achieved in 3 tumors (60%). No recurrence was observed during a mean follow-up of 24 ± 28.92 months.

Conclusion

Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma is a very rare tumor. It requires histopathological evaluation for accurate diagnosis, and complete surgical excision offers favorable short-term outcomes. Further studies are needed to better define its clinical characteristics and outcomes.

Introduction

Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma (EMC) is a rare, low-grade malignant neoplasm of the salivary glands characterized by its distinctive biphasic histological architecture [1-3]. It is composed of variable proportions of two cellular components arranged in double-layered duct-like structures: an inner layer of duct-lining epithelial cells and an outer layer of clear myoepithelial cells [1,2,4]. The clear myoepithelial component may predominate, occasionally complicating histopathologic interpretation [1,4].

The inner epithelial cells typically resemble intercalated duct cells and demonstrate eosinophilic cytoplasm, whereas the outer clear cells exhibit morphologic and immunophenotypic features consistent with myoepithelial differentiation [4,5]. The relative proportion of these two components may vary between tumors and within different areas of the same lesion, contributing to architectural heterogeneity [2,6].

In 1972, EMC was first described in the literature as a carcinoma [2]. However, due to its cytologic appearance, low mitotic activity, and limited nuclear pleomorphism, it was historically misclassified as a benign lesion [1,2]. It was not until 1991 that the World Health Organization (WHO) formally recognized EMC as a distinct malignant entity and classified it as a subtype of salivary gland adenocarcinoma [1,2,4].

Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma accounts for less than 1% of all salivary gland tumors [1]. Histologically, EMC may demonstrate multinodular growth, incomplete encapsulation, and focal infiltration into surrounding salivary gland parenchyma [2,4,6]. Despite its classification as a low-grade carcinoma, features such as perineural invasion, vascular invasion, and, in rare instances, dedifferentiation have been documented, reinforcing its malignant character [1,2,6].

The current report presents a single-center experience regarding the diagnosis, management, and prognosis of EMC. Using the most current evaluation criteria, the references were assessed for credibility [7].

Methods

Study design and setting

This single-center case series was conducted at a head and neck clinic in Iraq. The patients were managed between February 2020 and December 2025.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The study included patients with a confirmed histopathological diagnosis of EMC, while those with incomplete data were excluded.

Data Collection

Data were collected from the hospital’s registry and radiological reports, including demographic details, clinical presentation, medical history, histopathological reports, surgical procedures, and follow-up data.

Intervention

All cases underwent surgical intervention for parotid gland pathology via a modified lazy-S incision. Depending on the extent and characteristics of the lesion, either superficial parotidectomy or total conservative parotidectomy was performed. The procedure involved meticulous identification and preservation of the greater auricular nerve where feasible, followed by careful dissection and exploration of the facial nerve trunk and its branches to ensure nerve integrity. After complete excision of the lesion, thorough hemostasis was achieved. A surgical drain was inserted, and the wound was closed in anatomical layers.

Histopathological analysis

Histopathological analysis was performed on paraffin-embedded slices that were 5 μm thick. The sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for one to two minutes at room temperature after being fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for twenty-four hours. After that, the slices were examined using a Leica Microsystems GmbH light microscope.

Data analysis

The data collected were analyzed using an Excel spreadsheet (Microsoft Excel 2016). Descriptive statistics were applied to summarize the results and results were presented as mean ± standard deviation, range, frequencies, and percentages.

Results

Clinical findings

This study included 5 EMC cases, of which 4 (80%) were females and a male (20%). The average age of the patients was 56 ± 9.38 years. All the patients were non-smokers. Two patients (40%) had no significant past medical history, while a patient (20%) had hypertension, another patient (20%) had diabetes, and another (20%) had both hypertension and diabetes (Table 1). Two patients (40%) presented with right post-auricular swelling, one patient (20%) presented with right submandibular swelling, and 2 patients (40%) were incidental findings. On ultrasonography, tumor sizes ranged from 1.1 cm to 4.1 cm, with a mean size of 2.54 ± 1.25 cm. One patient (20%) underwent left submandibular gland excision, 1 (20%) underwent right submandibular gland excision, 2 (40%) underwent right superficial parotidectomy, and 1 (20%) underwent total conservative parotidectomy with supraomohyoid lymph node dissection. During follow up none of the patients developed recurrent swelling at the site of the previous operation. The follow-up ranged from 1 to 70 months, with a mean duration of 24 ± 28.92 months, with no cases of recurrence (Table 2).

Table 1. Sociodemographic data of the patients.

Case no.

Age

Sex

Medical History

Surgical History

Family History

Smoker

Duration

1

68

Female

HTN, DM

cholecystectomy

Negative

Not smoker

1 year

2

52

Female

Negative

D&C

Negative

Not smoker

-

3

48

Female

Negative

Negative

Negative

Not smoker

1 year

4

48

Female

HTN

Appendectomy

Negative

Not smoker

-

5

64

Male

DM

Negative

Negative

Not smoker

1 year

HTN, Hypertension; DM, Diabetes Mellitus; D&C, dilatation and curettage
Table 2. Clinical Characteristics, Management and follow-up.

No. cases

Presentation

Examination

Tumor size on ultrasound

Ultrasound

findings

Milan system

Operation

Histological diagnosis

Outcome

1

Right post-auricular swelling

Hard mass

35*19*16mm

Salivary gland nodule located in the right parotid gland

Not Performed 

Right superficial parotidectomy

Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma

No recurrence, Alive

2

Incidental findings

Small mobile mass

11*9*6mm

Mixed solid nodule in superficial part of right parotid gland

Milan IV-A

Right superficial parotidectomy

Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma

No recurrence, Alive

3

Right submandibular swelling

Mobile fixed mass

23*19*13mm

Salivary gland nodule located in the right submandibular gland

Not Performed 

Right submandibular gland excision

Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma

No recurrence, Alive

4

Incidental findings

Mobile fixed mass

41*30*28mm

 

Salivary gland nodule occupying left submandibular gland

Milan IV-A

Left submandibular gland excision

Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma

No

recurrence,

Alive

5

Right post-auricular swelling

Irregular, firm mobile mass

17*14*13mm

Mixed solid nodule in superficial part of right parotid gland

Milan VI

Total conservative parotidectomy + supraomohyoid Lymph node dissection

Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma

No recurrence, Alive

Pathological findings

Histopathological examination revealed epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma in all 5 patients. The average maximum tumor length on histopathological examination was 2.22 ± 0.91 cm. Four tumors (80%) exhibited an infiltrative growth pattern, while 1 (20%) had a pushing pattern. All 5 patients (100%) showed negative lymph node involvement. Three tumors (60%) had free margins, while 2 tumors (40%) had invasive margins. In terms of tumor necrosis visibility, 2 tumors (40%) had no visible necrosis, 2 tumors (40%) had visible focal necrosis, and 1 tumor (20%) had visible intra-tumoral and central necrosis (Table 3). Microscopically, a low-power view demonstrated nodules of a lobulated mass infiltrating into the adjacent salivary gland parenchyma (Figure 1). At higher magnification, the tumors were composed of two distinct populations of cells, some arranged as small ducts lined by epithelial cells, with another population composed of atypical cells with abundant clear cytoplasm (Figure 2). Further high-power examination highlighted these atypical clear cells with the presence of a mitotic figure within the field (Figure 3). Immunohistochemical analysis showed P63 immune stain highlighting the myoepithelial cells (Figure 4), while DOG1 immune stain demonstrated an apical membranous staining pattern in some of the epithelial cells (Figure 5).

Table 3. Tumor Characteristics and AJCC Pathological Staging.

Case No.

Tumor size

Tumor capsule

Tumor border (growth pattern)

Necrosis

Lymph-vascular invasion

Perineural invasion

Margins

Lymph nodes involvement

Pathological stage (AJCC)

1

2.5 cm

Not present

Infiltrative

Not seen

Not seen

Seen

Invasive

Not involved

pT2 N0

2

0.9 cm

Not Available

Infiltrative

Not seen

Not seen

Seen

Free

Not involved

pT1 N0

3

3 cm

Not Available

Infiltrative

Seen, focal

Not seen

Not seen

Free

Not involved

pT2 N0 R0

4

3 cm

Not Available

Infiltrative

Seen, focal

Not seen

Seen

Invasive

Not involved

pT2 N0

5

1.7 cm

Present, intact

Pushing

Seen, intra-tumoral, central

Not seen

Not seen

Free

Not involved

pT1 N0

AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer

Figure 1. Low power view showing nodules of a lobulated mass (dark arrows) infiltrating into the adjacent salivary gland parenchyma (dark stars). Hematoxylin and Eosin stain. 4x

Figure 2. Higher power view showing tumor composed of two populations of cells, some of them arranged as small ducts that lined by epithelial cells (dark arrows) with another populations of cells composed of atypical cells with abundant clear cytoplasm (green arrows). Hematoxylin and Eosin stain. 10X

Figure 3. Higher power view showing those atypical cells with clear cytoplasm (dark arrows) with presence of mitotic figure in the middle of the field (green arrow). Hematoxylin and Eosin stain. 40X

Figure 4. P63 immune stain highlighting the myoepithelial cells (dark arrow). 4x

Figure 5. DOG1 immune stain showing apical membranous staining pattern in some of the epithelial cells (dark arrows). 10X

Discussion

The clinical behavior of EMC reflects its low-grade malignant nature, though significant morbidity can result from local recurrence [6]. Data from the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology indicates that EMC constitutes approximately 1% of all salivary epithelial neoplasms and nearly 2% of malignant salivary epithelial neoplasms [1].

Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma predominantly affects older adults, with a peak incidence in the sixth and seventh decades of life, and demonstrates a female predominance [6]. In the present series, 80% of patients were female, with a mean age of 56 ± 9.38 years. These findings are consistent with the published literature. A previous analysis of 246 cases reported 57.32% females and 42.68% males, with a mean age of 63.8 ± 15.4 years [8]. Another review of 16 cases found a female-to-male ratio of approximately 1.6:1, with a mean age of 61.5 years [6].

Additional reports describing patients aged 64 and 65 years further support the predilection for older adults [3,4]. The slight differences in age and sex distribution between the present study and larger series may be attributable to the small sample size of the current cohort.

Regarding clinical presentation, EMC most commonly manifests as a painless mass [4]. In the current study, 60% of patients presented with painless swelling, while 40% were detected incidentally. Corio et al. reported that among nine patients with recorded symptoms, four (44.4%) presented with an asymptomatic swelling [6]. Taş et al. noted that their patient presented with a two-month history of a painless mass that had recently increased in size [3]. These observations reinforce the typically indolent clinical course of EMC, which may contribute to delayed detection in some cases.

Histologically, EMC demonstrates a multinodular growth pattern with variable proportions of ductal and myoepithelial cells [1]. In the present series, histologic grading was available for four cases (80%), of which 60% were classified as low-grade and 20% as intermediate-grade. Vázquez et al. reported that 32.93% of cases in their study were of low histologic grade (grades I and II), although histologic grade was unavailable for 60.57% of cases [8]. High-grade transformation, though rare (occurring in approximately 3.4% to 6.5% of cases), is associated with aggressive clinical behavior and poorer prognosis [9].

Surgical management remains the cornerstone of treatment for EMC [2]. In this series, treatment strategies were individualized based on tumor location and extent, with patients undergoing either parotidectomy or submandibular gland excision. Vázquez et al. reported that nearly all patients (97.1%) in their study underwent surgery, while 41.1% received adjuvant radiotherapy; however, no survival benefit was noted for patients who received radiotherapy compared with those who did not [8]. Adequate surgical resection with negative soft-tissue margins is considered the minimum recommended therapy because of the high risk of local recurrence [1,4].

Margin status remains a clinically significant parameter in EMC, given its recognized potential for local recurrence [1,6]. In the current series, invasive margins were identified in 40% of cases. Previous studies have reported high rates of local recurrence, including cases with multiple recurrences over prolonged follow-up periods and eventual distant metastasis [2,6]. The reported local recurrence rate approaches 50% in some series [4]. Despite the presence of invasive margins in 40% of the cases in this series, no recurrences were observed during the follow-up period, which ranged from 1 to 70 months (mean 24 ± 28.92 months).

Lymph node involvement and distant metastases are considered uncommon in EMC [1]. In the present series, no nodal or distant metastases were identified. A previous study reported distant metastases at diagnosis in only 4.5% of cases [8]. Friedrich and Donath, however, documented a case with multiple distant metastases to the lung and foot, demonstrating that although rare, metastatic spread remains a recognized clinical possibility [2]. Another report similarly reported one patient who developed metastasis to the kidney and subsequently died [6]. In a cytologic study of myoepithelial cell-rich neoplasms, observed that pleomorphism, coarse chromatin, prominent nucleoli, mitotic figures, and necrosis were seen exclusively in malignant specimens, including one case of EMC, providing useful cytologic criteria for distinguishing benign from malignant myoepithelial lesions [10].

The present study has several limitations. First, the follow-up duration was relatively short for assessing long-term recurrence and survival. Second, molecular and genetic analyses were not performed. Third, the small sample size limits the generalizability of the current series’ findings.

Conclusion

Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma requires histopathological evaluation for accurate diagnosis, and complete surgical excision offers favorable short-term outcomes. Further studies are needed to better define its clinical characteristics and outcomes.

Declarations

Conflicts of interest: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical approval: In accordance with our institution's oral policy, retrospective case series involving anonymized histopathological material and de-identified patient data do not require formal ethical approval.

Patient consent (participation and publication): Informed consent for publication was obtained from the patients.

Funding: The present study received no financial support.

Acknowledgements: None to be declared.

Authors' contributions: AMS, HOA, ROM, MLF, and IJH were significant contributors to the conception of the study, the literature search for related studies, managed the cases, and performed critical revision. AMA was a pathologist who contributed to the pathological analysis. STS and HAM contributed to the conception of the idea, data collection and interpretation, and critical revision. RSA, SHQ, SHH, DHH. AAQ contributed to the conception of the idea, literature review, table preparation, and critical revision. LLH contributed to the conception of the idea, literature review, and drafting of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Use of AI: ChatGPT-4.5 was used to assist with language refinement and improve the overall clarity of the manuscript. All content was thoroughly reviewed and approved by the authors, who bear full responsibility for the final version.

Data availability statement: The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Politi M, Robiony M, Avellini C, Orsaria M. Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma of the parotid gland: Clinicopathological aspect, diagnosis and surgical consideration. Annals of maxillofacial surgery. 2014;4(1):99-102. doi:10.4103/2231-0746.133085
  2. Friedrich RE, Donath K. Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma of the parotid gland with multiple distant metastases: a case report. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2000;58(6):690-4. doi:10.1016/S0278-2391(00)90171-X
  3. Taş A, Yağız R, Koten M, Karasalihoğlu AR, Altaner Ş. A case of epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma of the parotid gland. The Turkish Journal of Ear Nose and Throat. 2003;10(4):171-4. doi:N/A
  4. Silvers AR, Som PM, Brandwein M. Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma of the parotid gland. American journal of neuroradiology. 1996;17(3):560-2.
  5. Palmer RM. Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma: an immunocytochemical study. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology. 1985;59(5):511-5. doi:10.1016/0030-4220(85)90093-3
  6. Corio RL, Sciubba JJ, Brannon RB, Batsakis JG. Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma of intercalated duct origin: a clinicopathologic and ultrastructural assessment of sixteen cases. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology. 1982;53(3):280-7. doi:10.1016/0030-4220(82)90304-8
  7. Fahmi H. Kakamad, Shvan H. Mohammed, Berun A. Abdalla, Dahat A. Hussein, Zuhair D. Hammood, Suhaib H. Kakamad, et al. Non-Recommended Publishing Lists: Strategies for Detecting Deceitful Journals. Barw Medical Journal. 2026;4(1):13-21. doi:10.58742/bmj.v4i1.227
  8. Vázquez A, Patel TD, D’Aguillo CM, Abdou RY, Farver W, Baredes S, Eloy JA, Park RC. Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma of the salivary glands: an analysis of 246 cases. Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery. 2015;153(4):569-74. doi:10.1177/0194599815594788
  9. Nakaguro, M., & Nagao, T. Epithelial–Myoepithelial Carcinoma. Surgical Pathology Clinics, 2021;14(1), 97–109. doi:10.1016/j.path.2020.10.002
  10. Darvishian F, Lin O. Myoepithelial cell‐rich neoplasms: Cytologic features of benign and malignant lesions. Cancer Cytopathology: Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society. 2004;102(6):355-61. doi:10.1002/cncr.20642
How to Cite
1.
Abdulwahid M. Salih, Hiwa O. Abdullah, Ari M. Abdullah, Rebaz O. Mohammed, Mariwan L. Fattah, Imad J. Habibullah, et al. Epithelial-Myoepithelial Carcinoma of Salivary Glands: A Tertiary Center Experience. Barw Medical Journal. 2026 May 25;4(1):13-8. https://www.barwmedical.com/index.php/BMJ/article/view/233

Send mail to Author


Send Cancel
Themes by Openjournaltheme.com Themes by Openjournaltheme.com